Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible
Date: 1998-03-20 03:27:47
Message-ID: 3511E233.1E822290@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Thomas, I believe this is the problem with my processing a node 
> > twice. Do you have a fix for that, or should I make one?
> So, the patch for "function() BETWEEN" helps, but I'm still not sure
> it is safe, since I don't know how these nodes might be handled deeper 
> in the backend.

Bruce, did I remember to actually enclose the patch for you? Looks to me
like I didn't, so here it is again...

                  - Tom

Attachment: parse_expr.c.patch
Description: text/plain (861 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-03-20 03:53:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-03-20 02:47:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables >2GB

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group