Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible
Date: 1998-03-20 03:27:47
Message-ID: 3511E233.1E822290@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Thomas, I believe this is the problem with my processing a node
> > twice. Do you have a fix for that, or should I make one?
> So, the patch for "function() BETWEEN" helps, but I'm still not sure
> it is safe, since I don't know how these nodes might be handled deeper
> in the backend.

Bruce, did I remember to actually enclose the patch for you? Looks to me
like I didn't, so here it is again...

- Tom

Attachment Content-Type Size
parse_expr.c.patch text/plain 861 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-20 03:53:33 Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-20 02:47:48 Re: [HACKERS] tables >2GB