> But, it may be best to leave this until after the mega patch. I am not
> sure I want to share the blame ;-).
> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next
> release snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting
> until 6.4?
I would guess that we could post a separate patch any time soon,
especially since the changes are apparently isolated to only a few
places in the code. In the last release, we posted ~7 patches, each
independent of the others, and generated on our local source trees. Each
of the patches was, however, fairly simple, quite often only one or a
few lines of change, and were intended as bug fixes. Also, they were
easily tested. In any case, at a minimum the regression test should be
run (and passed!).
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jackson, DeJuan||Date: 1998-03-17 17:11:57|
|Subject: RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch...|
|Previous:||From: The Hermit Hacker||Date: 1998-03-17 16:33:28|
|Subject: Re: Unix Domain Sockets error (was Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!)|