Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com>
Cc: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Date: 1998-03-17 16:45:10
Message-ID: 350EA896.ADABF8C9@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> But, it may be best to leave this until after the mega patch. I am not 
> sure I want to share the blame ;-).
> 
> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next 
> release snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting 
> until 6.4?

I would guess that we could post a separate patch any time soon,
especially since the changes are apparently isolated to only a few
places in the code. In the last release, we posted ~7 patches, each
independent of the others, and generated on our local source trees. Each
of the patches was, however, fairly simple, quite often only one or a
few lines of change, and were intended as bug fixes. Also, they were
easily tested. In any case, at a minimum the regression test should be
run (and passed!).

                      - Tom

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jackson, DeJuanDate: 1998-03-17 17:11:57
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch...
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-03-17 16:33:28
Subject: Re: Unix Domain Sockets error (was Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group