Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: Chris Albertson <chris(at)topdog(dot)pas1(dot)logicon(dot)com>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Date: 1998-03-16 08:09:07
Message-ID: 350CDE23.6D219D91@sable.krasnoyarsk.su (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Chris Albertson wrote:
> 
> I know you must have looked at far more Postgresql code then I have but
> I was browsing the storage manager.  Apparently it is fairly easy to
> assign a class to a manager as each class is tagged in the system catalog
> with a storage method.  What I really want is a >2GB table.  I was trying
> to see if this was supported by reading the source.  Looks like it may be.
> The note in the To Do list includes testing.  I would test it but for
> lack of disk space. (I'll have more in a while.)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c:

#define RELSEG_SIZE ...

- just decrease it!

Vadim

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brett McCormickDate: 1998-03-16 08:15:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 1998-03-16 07:56:58
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group