Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 21:08:04
Message-ID: 34d269d41002251308i290a18b0wa7b8e7dfc4aba4d4@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 14:06, David E. Wheeler
<david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> There is one fairly good answer:
>>
>> Use a perl that's compiled to support multiplicity but not threads.

> That solves the problem with recursion or with $a and $b or both?

Yes ATM because we only kick in the extra security if you are on
threads... Its a bit of a kludge in Safe.  I know Tim wants to rectify
that...

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-02-25 21:09:58
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-25 21:06:51
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group