Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 06:34:18
Message-ID: 34d269d41002242234h20b16750t87bba62c681bad4a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 22:01, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok I can get behind this.  I did some testing and we could probably
> even store less than than that if we could do the equivalent of:
> Safe->share('::mksafefunc');
> pl_perl_createsub()
> Safe->unshare('::mksafefunc');

On 2nd thought this basically requires your fix anyway. To make it so
you can share something in safe from within safe means we will need to
enable more opcodes there... so it would end up being the same
solution.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Toni Helenius 2010-02-25 06:58:53 Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 05:01:34 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)