Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 03:48:27
Message-ID: 34d269d41002241948o70442eb6jd78208b208bb5a77@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:37, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Seems entirely unacceptable.

> I think we will see if we can get this fixed on the Safe/perl side then.

BTW the trade off here is we revert back to sort { $a <=> $b } not
working. That is if you could call it a trade off... The level of
breaking is not really comparable :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-25 03:58:17 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-02-25 03:38:17 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)