Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 21:16:04
Message-ID: 34d269d41001291316q2bd1d5fdsff89577aa511be28@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:03, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.

After skimming the thread Bruce linked:
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-04/msg00512.php

It certainly seems "insufficiently-thought-out".  :(

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-01-29 21:20:16
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-01-29 21:06:55
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group