| From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setting oom_adj on linux? |
| Date: | 2010-01-09 03:46:10 |
| Message-ID: | 34d269d41001081946tad0030s1fb1be40f9861e03@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:24, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> There were a few issues, as it turns out, the particularly annoying one
> was in the init script which caused upgrades to fail due to sshd not
> being restarted, bug report here:
Thanks for the pointers!
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473573
The changes I proposed to the example linux startup script wont suffer
from that.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487325
>
> In the end, the problem was with errors being returned from attempts to
> modify oom_adj. As long as we can just ignore those hopefully there
> won't be any issues.
Yep sounds good.
Thanks again!
Tom, sounds like you got busy with other stuff :) Should I submit a
new patch that uses open and O_WRONLY?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-09 03:57:07 | Re: Setting oom_adj on linux? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-09 03:36:43 | Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH] |