Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] sequences

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
Cc: mrogan(at)fpelectronics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, stanb(at)awod(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sequences
Date: 1998-03-02 03:31:03
Message-ID: 34FA27F7.AB28F3D0@sable.krasnoyarsk.su (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Brett McCormick wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 27 February 1998, at 10:27:07, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> > Michael J. Rogan wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > But we could return PRIMARY KEY of affected tuple if it exists!
> > > > I kept this feature in mind when thought about removing OID...
> > > >
> > > > Comments ?
> > >
> > > This would be very useful.  I never did like the idea of using OID as
> > > reference so a way to get the PIMARY KEY would be  A GOOD THING(tm).
> >
> > But we will have to decide how to deal with multi-key PK...
> >
> > Vadim
> 
> How is this implemented?

Using multi-key unique btree indices. 

Vadim

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-03-02 04:01:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-03-02 03:23:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group