Brett McCormick wrote:
> Are there any plans to implement oid-style functionality for
> sequences, such as returning the nextval in the result tuple somehow?
> Is it at all possible to implement? That is one very nice thing about
> using oid instead, is that it comes back in PQoidStatus. I probably
> won't stop using oids until this is possible (i've got my own restore
> which "preserves" (i.e. renumbers) oid references)
Not possible - sequences are just "a gear", user can use more than
one sequences in inserts, etc...
But we could return PRIMARY KEY of affected tuple if it exists!
I kept this feature in mind when thought about removing OID...
In response to
- sequences at 1998-02-26 02:56:36 from Brett McCormick
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-02-26 03:43:48|
|Subject: Re: [PORTS] alpha/64bit & mkoidname problem|
|Previous:||From: Brett McCormick||Date: 1998-02-26 03:34:12|
|Subject: alpha/64bit & mkoidname problem|