Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is there a version number in the WAL file?

catversion.h will do fine, no?

> Can we put conditional code in there to create
> new log file records with an updated format?

The WAL stuff is *far* too complex already.  I've spent a week studying
it and I only partially understand it.  I will not consent to trying to
support multiple log file formats concurrently.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: WAL & RC1 status at 2001-03-02 15:43:00 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: WAL & RC1 status at 2001-03-02 15:54:04 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: The Hermit Hacker	Date: 2001-03-02 15:51:11
	Subject: Re: WAL & RC1 status
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-03-02 15:43:00
	Subject: Re: WAL & RC1 status