Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Don't you ever run the tests before checking stuff in?
> ... Nope. I do it once a batch is checked in. I assume submitters have
> already done it. Too much work.
Whether or not you assume that the submitter ran regress tests, it's
unsafe to assume that a several-days-old patch is still good against
current CVS tip. Especially not when you get merge failures, as you
certainly must have in this case.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-04-24 05:06:42|
|Subject: Re: regression tests for ALTER TABLE ... DEFAULT|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-04-24 04:56:31|
|Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not |