Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
Date: 2005-01-21 14:00:32
Message-ID: 33833.24.211.141.25.1106316032.squirrel@www.dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Dave Page said:
>

>>
>> Hmm:
>>
>> Windows:
>>
>> VOID Sleep(DWORD dwMilliseconds);
>>
>> Unix:
>>
>> unsigned int sleep(unsigned int seconds);
>>
>> D'oh!
>>
>> Patch coming up....
>

We should not be using either of these, should we? pg_usleep() is platform
independent.

cheers

andrew



In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-21 14:04:01
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-21 13:36:07
Subject: Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-21 14:04:01
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-21 13:36:07
Subject: Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group