Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: 2006-12-12 15:47:42
Message-ID: 3356.1165938462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net> writes:
> No, fsync=on. The tps values are similarly unstable with fsync=off,
> though -- I'm seeing bursts of high tps values followed by low-tps
> valleys, a kind of staccato flow indicative of a write caching being
> filled up and flushed.

It's notoriously hard to get repeatable numbers out of pgbench :-(

A couple of tips:
* don't put any faith in short runs. I usually use -t 1000
plus -c whatever.
* make sure you loaded the database (pgbench -i) with a scale
factor (-s) at least equal to the maximum -c you want to test.
Otherwise you're mostly measuring update contention.
* pay attention to when checkpoints occur. You probably need
to increase checkpoint_segments if you want pgbench not to be
checkpoint-bound.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel van Ham Colchete 2006-12-12 15:57:20 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Previous Message Bill Moran 2006-12-12 15:26:10 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations