Re: elog(NOIND)?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog(NOIND)?
Date: 2001-06-06 18:03:28
Message-ID: 3323.991850608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Does anyone want to keep elog(NOIND)? It's not used anywhere, and I think
> the notion of indentation levels, while kind of obsolete with syslog
> anyway, should not be part of the elog API.

Nuke it.

While you're at it, rearrange the numeric order of the elog levels to be
sensible. There are some bizarrely-coded tests in elog.c that could be
simplified if severity levels had the obvious ordering.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feng Tian 2001-06-06 18:17:16 Adding some new operators
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-06 18:00:38 Re: Dual-CPU slower then Single under HP?