Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: elog(NOIND)?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog(NOIND)?
Date: 2001-06-06 18:03:28
Message-ID: 3323.991850608@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Does anyone want to keep elog(NOIND)?  It's not used anywhere, and I think
> the notion of indentation levels, while kind of obsolete with syslog
> anyway, should not be part of the elog API.

Nuke it.

While you're at it, rearrange the numeric order of the elog levels to be
sensible.  There are some bizarrely-coded tests in elog.c that could be
simplified if severity levels had the obvious ordering.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Feng TianDate: 2001-06-06 18:17:16
Subject: Adding some new operators
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-06 18:00:38
Subject: Re: Dual-CPU slower then Single under HP?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group