Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Does anyone want to keep elog(NOIND)?  It's not used anywhere, and I think
> the notion of indentation levels, while kind of obsolete with syslog
> anyway, should not be part of the elog API.

Nuke it.

While you're at it, rearrange the numeric order of the elog levels to be
sensible.  There are some bizarrely-coded tests in elog.c that could be
simplified if severity levels had the obvious ordering.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• elog(NOIND)? at 2001-06-06 17:28:01 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: elog(NOIND)? at 2001-06-07 14:40:08 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Feng Tian	Date: 2001-06-06 18:17:16
	Subject: Adding some new operators
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-06-06 18:00:38
	Subject: Re: Dual-CPU slower then Single under HP?