> I think the background thread, especially timer thread is better solution
> then sending data to server.
I disagree because this task (receive notifications) is not an often task.
There are many many installations that do not need it. And prefer to
implement such a task in inefficient way than to make all the connections in
the world more complex and resource-consuming.
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: MILTOS MILTIADOUS||Date: 2009-12-21 22:43:03|
|Subject: Re: URGENT HELP NEEDED. CALLING STORED PROCEDURES USING JDBC|
|Previous:||From: rsmogura||Date: 2009-12-21 14:03:13|
|Subject: Re: Cheapest way to poll for notifications? & Driver improvement question re SSL and notify|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Nicola Farina||Date: 2009-12-21 16:06:02|
|Subject: Who writes "CONTEXT" ?|
|Previous:||From: Adrian Klaver||Date: 2009-12-21 15:51:36|
|Subject: Re: import warnings ?|