Re: Delete performance again

From: Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Delete performance again
Date: 2008-10-02 15:21:59
Message-ID: 331e40660810020821w4c4f212br3943df435589f731@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2008/10/2 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

> "=?ISO-8859-5?B?svbi0Nv22SDC2Nzn2OjY3Q==?=" <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > delete from company where id not in (select company_id from
> company_descr);
> > I've tried to analyze command, but unlike to other RDBM I've used it did
> not
> > include cascade deletes/checks into query plan. That is first problem.
> > It was SLOW.
>
> Usually the reason for that is having forgotten to make an index on the
> referencing column(s) ?
>

Not at all. As you can see below in original message, simply "extending" the
query to what should have been done by optimizer helps. I'd say optimizer
always uses fixed plan not taking into account that this is massive update
and id doing index lookup of children records for each parent record, while
it would be much more effective to perform removal of all children records
in single table scan.

It's like trigger "for each record" instead of "for each statement".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Childs 2008-10-03 07:25:42 Slow Inserts on large tables
Previous Message paul 2008-10-02 15:14:34 Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning