| From: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: partitioning using dblink |
| Date: | 2008-03-03 22:57:35 |
| Message-ID: | 331494.11814.qm@web28108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> > >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> > >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> > >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> > >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
Is there a "specific" reason why views can't be part of an inheritance tree?
I mean: it's that we "don't want" it or it would be just difficult to implement?
___________________________________
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-03 23:26:57 | Re: partitioning using dblink |
| Previous Message | Dee | 2008-03-03 21:33:22 | Re: beginner: what permissions required to install on windows 2000+ |