Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Two points about docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: "Vladimir Chukharev" <chu(at)kemia(dot)me(dot)tut(dot)fi>,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two points about docs
Date: 2005-05-11 13:39:08
Message-ID: 3311.1115818748@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote:
>> And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all
>> functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull.
>> Can you comment on that?

> This has been brought up in the past. I don't think there's any reason 
> there can't be one. Want to make a function appendix? :)

I think this is more conventionally called an index ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-11 13:59:52
Subject: Re: Two points about docs
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-05-11 13:36:55
Subject: Re: Two points about docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group