Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: performance issue with a specific query

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Eliott <eliott100(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance issue with a specific query
Date: 2006-07-27 20:18:07
Message-ID: 3304.1154031487@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Enterprises are not going to compile. They are going to accept the 
>> latest support by vendor release.
>> 
>> Redhat has a tendency to  be incredibly stupid about this particular 
>> area of their packaging.

> Stupid how?

Red Hat feels (apparently accurately, judging by their subscription
revenue ;-)) that what RHEL customers want is a platform that's stable
over multi-year application lifespans.  So major incompatible changes in
the system software are not looked on with favor.  That's why RHEL4
is still shipping PG 7.4.*.  You can call it a stupid policy if you
like, but it's hard to argue with success.

However, there will be an RH-supported release of PG 8.1.* as an optional
add-on for RHEL4.  Real Soon Now, I hope --- the release date has been
pushed back a couple times already.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Richard RowellDate: 2006-07-27 21:37:02
Subject: Strange behaviour
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-07-27 19:35:20
Subject: Re: Savepoint performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group