Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inheritance docs error.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inheritance docs error.
Date: 2000-12-30 18:05:05
Message-ID: 3295.978199505@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> It seems that the last one is correct -- or at least works for me.

> They are all correct:  UNDER is the new SQL99 syntax, INHERITS is the
> traditional Postgres syntax.

Current docs do appear to be erroneous: they claim the UNDER phrase goes
where INHERIT does, which is not what the grammar thinks.  I haven't
looked at SQL99 to see which is right.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-12-30 19:12:32
Subject: Re: Inheritance docs error.
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-12-30 14:47:20
Subject: Re: Inheritance docs error.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-30 18:15:07
Subject: Re: pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-30 17:57:06
Subject: Re: oid failures on Alpha solved

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group