Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>,Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-29 18:19:14
Message-ID: 329.1020104354@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those
> evenually ... ?

Presumably, an error inside a nested transaction would cause you to
revert back to whatever the SET situation was at start of that
subtransaction.

Offhand this doesn't seem any harder than any other part of what we'd
have to do for nested transactions.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2002-04-29 18:39:38
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2002-04-29 18:13:44
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group