this discussion belongs on -performance
Luke Lonergan said:
> On 7/21/05 7:53 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Well I know that isn't true at least not with ANY of the Dells my
>> customers have purchased in the last 18 months. They are still really,
>> really slow.
> That's too bad, can you cite some model numbers? SCSI?
>> I have great success with Silicon Image as long as I am running them
>> with Linux software RAID. The LSI controllers are also really nice.
> That's good to hear, I gave up on Silicon Image controllers on Linux
> about 1 year ago, which kernel are you using with success? Silicon
> controllers are the most popular, so it's important to see them
> supported well, though I'd rather see more SATA headers than 2 off of
> the built-in chipsets.
> - Luke
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Dawid Kuroczko||Date: 2005-07-22 09:10:05|
|Subject: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?|
|Previous:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2005-07-22 04:19:04|
|Subject: Re: COPY FROM performance improvements|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-07-22 07:51:26|
|Subject: Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: [HACKERS] Constant|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-07-22 05:00:45|
|Subject: Re: Timezone bugs|