"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> ... It's not entirely clear whether BIO_new_fp() would avoid the
>> problematic calls, but it doesn't look like it'd be hard to try.
> The last version of the patch I posted uses BIO_new_file() in all cases, and (from memory) BIO_get_fp() in the non-win32 case to get a FILE* to pass to fstat.
Did you manage to get rid of the bogus-error-message problem that
afflicted the first version of the patch? If so, this way is fine.
If not, keeping control of file-opening in our own hands might be
a way to dodge that.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-09-29 14:50:34|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily modify tsearch regression tests to suppress notice |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-09-29 11:14:25|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily modify tsearch
regression tests to suppress notice|