On May 30, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
> of the sanity check. I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.
Should you be validating them on a per-time zone basis? Or does it matter?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Sergey Koposov||Date: 2012-05-30 23:16:27|
|Subject: Re: 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks,
CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile|
|Previous:||From: Ants Aasma||Date: 2012-05-30 22:40:13|
|Subject: Re: Early hint bit setting|