Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: darwin pgsql patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches
Date: 2000-12-01 15:49:01
Message-ID: 3189.975685741@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> writes:
> In other news, I just (litterally a minute ago) fixed the last issues
> with my port (hurray!), and the regression test passes every test
> except geometry, where the diffs differ in the 15th decimal digit for
> the last coordinate pair. Rounding error somewhere?

Do the results match either of the existing expected-files for powerpc
systems?

> Do the regression tests adequately stress semaphores? Are semephores
> used interprocess? Do the regression tests cause this sort of use to
> be tested?

The parallel format ("make check") provides at least some confidence.
The regress tests don't really exercise IPC very thoroughly though :-(

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-02 17:30:54
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches
Previous:From: Peter BiermanDate: 2000-12-01 08:51:09
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group