Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 14:23:36
Message-ID: 3188.1238423016@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It sounds like everyone has converged on agreeing that this way is okay
>> for 8.4?  Object now or hold your peace ...

> What are we doing with PQinitSSL()?

Nothing, except improving the documentation.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-03-30 14:25:41
Subject: Re: psql \d* and system objects
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-03-30 14:22:34
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group