Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Date: 2011-04-04 18:42:07
Message-ID: 3186.1301942527@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
> so maybe we should just apply it and move on.

I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what the
roadmap is.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 18:48:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 17:28:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-04 18:43:25
Subject: Re: time table for beta1
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-04 18:41:08
Subject: Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group