Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Date: 2006-08-24 12:55:08
Message-ID: 3181.1156424108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I was also considering going ahead and implementing Hannu's ALTER INDEX SET
> UNIQUE too.

Don't waste your time, when we don't have an algorithm that would make
it work. It's too late for 8.2 anyway...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-24 13:28:52 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Previous Message Dhanaraj M 2006-08-24 12:09:15 Re: Have psql show current sequnce values - (Resubmission)