Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via
Date: 2006-04-30 19:29:08
Message-ID: 3175.1146425348@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Documentation added, patch attached and applied. Thanks.

I just got around to reading this patch. Why is the syntax GRANT CONNECTION
and not GRANT CONNECT? Privilege names are generally verbs not nouns.
Unless someone can point to a good reason for CONNECTION, I'm going to
change it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2006-04-30 20:24:02 fori stmt with by keyword was:(Re: [HACKERS] for statement, adding a STEP clause?)
Previous Message Sven Suursoho 2006-04-30 19:01:23 Re: plpython improvements