Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> I've considered whether it's worthwhile going to other way: getting the
> IndexScan executer node to uses getmulti to reduce index AM overhead.
> But that requires backward scan support also...
I think Heikki got most of the low-hanging fruit already with that patch
for page-at-a-time scanning in btree. There's some wasted overhead just
from multiple levels of function call, but I doubt it's really a big
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bort, Paul||Date: 2006-07-26 16:01:49|
|Subject: Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation|
|Previous:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-07-26 15:54:31|
|Subject: Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti|