Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?

From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?
Date: 2006-03-08 21:34:53
Message-ID: 315A9142-790A-4595-BF2A-0878E948DD79@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mar 8, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Chris Mair wrote:

>
>>> It is completely unrelated. The name is a (confusing) coincidence.
>>
>> Can we call it something else then?   Anything else?
>
> Hi there,
>
> at last we came up with a new name: we'd like to call the project
> "protopg" (which would stand for PROprietary TO PostGresql).
> With all lowercase spelling.
>
> Josh,
> would that name qualify?

So do you intend to eventually support other databases? That'd be  
cool (to say the least). How expandable is the current architecture?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2006-03-08 21:37:35
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-03-08 20:35:56
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group