Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Date: 2006-01-27 16:47:32
Message-ID: 3153.1138380452@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My question was at a higher level, actually: *what* should we be
>> counting?

> Oh, I see.  Do you think small incremental improvements to the stat
> system will buy us much?  I think we should be thinking big here, i.e.
> rewrite most stuff instead.

Uh, I wasn't aware of any proposals for a major rewrite.  What did you
have in mind?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-01-27 17:27:16
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-01-27 16:27:10
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2006-01-27 17:00:44
Subject: Re: TSearch2 / German compound words / UTF-8
Previous:From: Uwe C. SchroederDate: 2006-01-27 16:42:06
Subject: Re: Allowing Custom Fields

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group