| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples | 
| Date: | 2007-11-19 18:33:03 | 
| Message-ID: | 3125.1195497183@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The race conditions are a lot more subtle than that.  The stats
>> collector cannot know when it receives a tabstat message after VACUUM
>> starts whether VACUUM has/will see the tuples involved, or whether it
>> will see them as committed or not.  That would depend on whether VACUUM
>> has yet reached the page(s) the tuples are in.
> I think the before-and-after approach can be made to work:
> VACUUM just needs to save the counter in memory, it doesn't need to
> write that anywhere else.
> VACUUM can force the flush of the tabstat file so that there is no race
> condition, or at least a minimised one.
I don't think you understood what I said at all.  The race condition is
not "before vs after VACUUM starts", it is "before vs after when VACUUM
scans the page that the in-doubt tuple is in".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-19 18:37:48 | Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave | 
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-11-19 18:00:31 | Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples |