Re: vacuumlo.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Grant <grant(at)conprojan(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumlo.
Date: 2001-07-31 01:29:41
Message-ID: 3106.996542981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Grant <grant(at)conprojan(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is it possible to get [vacuumlo] included in the main vacuumdb program for
> support to vacuum orphaned large objects?

Hmm. I'm not convinced that vacuumlo is ready for prime time...
in particular, how safe is it in the presence of concurrent
transactions that might be adding or removing LOs?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • vacuumlo. at 2001-07-31 00:14:50 from Grant

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grant 2001-07-31 01:52:10 Re: vacuumlo.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 00:59:38 Re: Re: OpenUnix 8 Patchj