Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server unreliability

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>,PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-29 20:40:42
Message-ID: 3104.1096490442@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, but how far is it from the image I saw to the completed site?  I
> have no idea, and why has there been so little progress in the past few
> years?

Lack of people doing the work is why.  Complaining that nothing is
getting done is just sucking time away from more productive activities
... and I think that extends to all the points made in this thread.
We all know perfectly well what the problems are --- it's a matter of
finding time, and sometimes money, to solve them.  We don't need "new
ideas" unless the ideas are about how to produce those resources.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-29 20:41:11
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-09-29 20:35:20
Subject: Re: Server unreliability

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-29 20:41:11
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-09-29 20:35:20
Subject: Re: Server unreliability

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group