| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |
| Date: | 2005-06-25 23:09:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3089.1119740986@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> What about this one:
> case COPY_OLD_FE:
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE),
> + errmsg("Old FE protocal not yet supported in fast COPY processing
> (CopyGetData())")));
> This can't stay like it is, can it?
Certainly not --- that omission will have to be fixed if this is to be
accepted. However, I'd counsel Luke and Alon not to spend any time on
it until the other questions about the patch have been dealt with.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-25 23:11:39 | Re: limiting connections per user/database |
| Previous Message | Alon Goldshuv | 2005-06-25 23:04:06 | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |