Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Disabling function validation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation
Date: 2003-10-06 23:13:30
Message-ID: 3085.1065482010@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think we should change the "check_function_bodies" to something more
> general.  I like "restore_validation_mode" because it could also be used
> to disable foreign key checks which we are discussing.

I think I'd prefer to keep foreign key check disabling separate.  Or at
least make it separately selectable.  Maybe validation_mode could have
multiple levels ("off", "safe", "risky")?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-06 23:17:22
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation
Previous:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-10-06 22:59:43
Subject: rserv and inet data type

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-06 23:17:22
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-06 22:52:44
Subject: Disabling function validation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group