Re: enable_joinremoval

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: enable_joinremoval
Date: 2010-03-29 15:42:33
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1003290842k6a5e1986t9bf1992a816c8547@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It seems that what's really needed is some debug output to be able to
>>> find out what it did.
>>
>> +1, i was preparing an env for testing this but in the while i was
>> thinking how can i know what happens... counting the tables in the
>> explain analyze? it's possible but not ideal
>
> I don't actually see much value in making EXPLAIN show which tables
> were removed.

no, i was thinking in something like a DEBUG message indicating that
that rel is being removed... maybe a DEBUG1 message

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-29 15:46:55 Re: enable_joinremoval
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-29 15:40:26 Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1