Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Sándor Miglécz <sandor(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Date: 2010-01-13 14:39:29
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1001130639j13a9f518ma44392a5cea1f751@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/1/13 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>>
>> well, i actually think that PANIC is too high for this...
>>
>
> Well, it tries to lock and then open a critical system index.
> Failure to open it has PANIC, it seemed appropriate to use
> the same error level if the lock failure case.
>

if you try to open a critical system index and it doesn't exist is
clearly a signal of corruption, if you can't lock it it's just a
concurrency issue... don't see why they both should have the same
level of message

-- 
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-13 14:56:58
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2010-01-13 14:19:43
Subject: Bloom index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group