2010/1/13 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
> Tom Lane írta:
>> If this patch is touching those parts of relcache.c, it probably needs
> What I did there is to check the return value of LockRelationOid()
the hunk was because a diference in the position (i guess patch accept
a hunk of reasonable size, assuming there is something like a
reasonable size for that)
and is not touching the same as your refactor (sorry if i explain myself bad)
> and also elog(PANIC) if the lock wasn't available.
> Does it need rethinking?
well, i actually think that PANIC is too high for this...
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2010-01-13 07:51:43|
|Subject: Re: ECPG patch causes warning|
|Previous:||From: Boszormenyi Zoltan||Date: 2010-01-13 06:07:52|
|Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch|