Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sándor Miglécz <sandor(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Date: 2010-01-13 04:11:48
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1001122011i722cbd67od637223768e67dca@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and I am happy to present the newest patch. Current state is
> that it doesn't segfault and seems to work as expected.
> These combinations below were tested.
>

it has a hunk failed when trying to apply i guess it's because of
Tom's refactor of relcache.c
it's a simple fix so i will not bother anyone, patch attached

-- 
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

Attachment: 5-pg85-locktimeout-11.1-ctxdiff.patch
Description: text/x-patch (89.8 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-01-13 04:26:49
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-01-13 04:06:14
Subject: Re: plpython3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group