Re: parallel restore vs. windows

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Andrew Chernow" <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Date: 2008-12-24 22:11:15
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0812241411t71a60f44j16d6a7083a1f88f1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> This version completes properly on Windows with the regression database.
>

actually, this one doesn't apply cleanly on head

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-12-24 22:58:29 Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Previous Message Emmanuel Cecchet 2008-12-24 20:43:47 Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions