Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?
Date: 2014-06-21 03:40:31
Message-ID: 30691.1403322031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> [ counting bits in ACLs ]

Wouldn't it be fairly painless to widen AclMode from 32 bits to 64,
and thereby double the number of available bits?

That code was all written before we required platforms to have an int64
primitive type, but of course now we expect that.

In any case, I concur with the position that this feature patch should
be separate from a patch to make additional bitspace available.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2014-06-21 03:59:24 Re: Audit of logout
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-06-21 02:33:56 Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?