Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We could fix it by changing <> to IS DISTINCT FROM ... but I've never
>> been very happy with the idea that \df tries to suppress I/O functions
>> anyway.  How do you feel about removing the cstring test altogether?

> I like the cstring test.  I don't think users want to see functions they
> can't call from SQL, and they will ask about them if we show them.

What makes you think you can't call 'em from SQL?

regression=# select int4in('345');
 int4in 
--------
    345
(1 row)


			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 04:53:18 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 05:08:21 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-04-01 04:59:43
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-04-01 04:53:18
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-04-01 04:59:43
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-04-01 04:53:18
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments