Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: width_bucket() per SQL2003 (WIP)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches (PostgreSQL) <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: width_bucket() per SQL2003 (WIP)
Date: 2004-04-30 06:04:06
Message-ID: 305446A6-9A6C-11D8-9BFE-000A95AB279E@samurai.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On 30-Apr-04, at 1:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Other than "it's in SQL2003", what's the point of implementing this?

No idea, but it doesn't really matter IMHO: it is in SQL2003, it 
doesn't interfere with the rest of the system or impose a significant 
maintenance burden and it has essentially zero negative side effects. 
So why _not_ implement it?

> Trying to implement everything in Oracle is a goal up with which we 
> must
> not try to keep.

Granted, but that's not the case here.

-Neil


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-04-30 06:18:47
Subject: Re: FW: Timezone library
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-04-30 05:46:37
Subject: Re: width_bucket() per SQL2003 (WIP)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group