Re: CommitDelay performance improvement

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Date: 2001-02-24 03:56:42
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010224145642.03242460@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 21:31 23/02/01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Now, I know many will complain that we are returning commit while not
>having the stuff on the platter.

You're definitely right there.

>Maybe they do, but it seems
>the benefit of grouped fsyncs() is large enough that many will say they
>would rather have this option.

I'd prefer to wait for a lock manager that supports timeouts and contention
notification.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2001-02-24 03:59:42 Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Previous Message Philip Warner 2001-02-24 03:54:12 Re: CommitDelay performance improvement