Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?)

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net
Cc: PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?)
Date: 2000-10-30 03:40:09
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001030144009.02c4bd90@mail.rhyme.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 17:52 29/10/00 -0800, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>I'm afraid that for now, we should accept the improvements that
>have been achieved, and consider a more general treatment of
>parentheses later.
>
>What do you think?
>

Just to clarify: what is the status of the improvements that are
implemented? Are you saying we have ORDER/LIMIT in subselect, but the only
thing not added is multiple levels of parentheses?


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-10-30 04:02:48
Subject: Re: WAL status update
Previous:From: Kevin O'GormanDate: 2000-10-30 01:52:02
Subject: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group