Re: relation ### modified while in use

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: relation ### modified while in use
Date: 2000-10-23 07:14:31
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001023171431.022f1b60@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 01:37 23/10/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>What I'm proposing is that once an xact has touched a
>table, other xacts should not be able to apply schema updates to that
>table until the first xact commits.

Totally agree. You may want to go further and say that metadata changes can
not be made while that *connection* exists: if the client has prepared a
query against a table will it cause a problem when the query is run?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pete Forman 2000-10-23 07:50:37 Re: Add support for <xti.h>
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-10-23 06:53:42 Re: pgsql/src/test/regress/expected (plpgsql.out inet.out foreign_key.out errors.out)