Re: TODO updates

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO updates
Date: 2000-07-23 13:11:12
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000723231112.022d4a10@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 14:58 23/07/00 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>* Some database schema's are not dumpable; do dumps in oid order
>* make pg_dump dump in oid order, so dependencies are resolved
>

As of the latest pg_dump, it dumps in modified oid order: rules, triggers,
views and indexes always go at end, but the rest is in oid order. If people
want a strict oid order, then it's a matter of commenting out 4 or 5 lines...

Does this mean I've actually done a ToDo item? I was trying to limit myself
to useless features that noone wants...

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2000-07-23 14:00:57 INET/CIDR types
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-23 12:58:39 TODO updates